
​
“Obviously, I'm a huge fan of evidence, but the bulk of what we do is not and will never be evidence-based in that there’s never going to be enough randomized control trials on everything we do; to support everything we do, so then we have to start using things like theoretical coherence, biological plausibility, and most importantly with the available evidence. . .”​
Craig Payne, Podiatrist: PodChatLive Ep. 1, Dec 2017.
All podcasts are presented by Notebook LM
Summary
This article and podcast explores the history and rationale behind the use of a 4-degree rearfoot post in orthotic devices, specifically as developed by Dr. Merton Root in the 1950s and 1960s. The author, Ray Anthony, explains that Root's design was based on the idea that the average foot requires 4 degrees of heel eversion during the contact phase of gait, a belief that influenced the development of the Root Functional Foot Orthosis (RFFO). Anthony critiques the modern use of this prescription protocol, arguing that the 4-degree rearfoot post is only effective within the context of the rigid materials and design principles of the RFFO, and that its efficacy in modern orthotic designs utilizing flexible materials is questionable. He emphasizes that Root’s prescription paradigm is not a universal solution for orthotic design and that contemporary understanding of foot biomechanics has evolved significantly since Root’s original work.